• @Fungah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -171 year ago

    I don’t want a huge influx of users. Lemmy is good. I like Lemmy. A flood of people enshitify it.

      • @Sanyanov@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Best option IMO.

        Would allow this beautiful place to grow and fill up with wonderful people and content, and at the same time newbies will have time to accomodate for Lemmy ethos and customs, forming a healthy and wonderful community.

    • PuddingFeeling
      link
      fedilink
      English
      151 year ago

      We would get more financial support for third party apps and more content.

    • @lugal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      In my opinion, it’s not growth in users that’s the problem but in capital. The more the platform wants to earn, the shittier it gets. And since lemmy isn’t going to earn anything, it ain’t get shitty

    • @stevehobbes@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      Lemmy broadly is very group-think right now. There isn’t a large diversity of opinion yet; growth would be good - the real issue is when you have actually saturated a market, the only way to grow is through increasingly shitty things (see: reddit). Lemmy won’t have those same problems because the commercial model is so different (non-existent).

      • @SpookyUnderwear@eviltoast.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Agreed. The person you’re responding to thinks it’s good because most people are aligned with his/her opinions. It’s currently nothing more than a large echo chamber. A fresh injection of users will do Lemmy well for diversity of thought.