Screenshot doesn’t even show half.

  • Gamey
    link
    fedilink
    92 years ago

    Flatpaks aren’t very relevant for servers if I am not wrong but Canonical definitely tties to push Snaps for that usecase, I feel like other container technologies like Docker or Podman are a lot more relevant in that context and containerization in general is really nice especially for server use and not that hard to wrap your head around! ;)

    • Zeppo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      Yeah, that’s really what I haven’t used that seems significant these days - Docker. I used to use VMs a fair bit including the premade ones from MS for IE testing, which I think (?) are the same concept.

      • Gamey
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        Well not really, Docker dose run another Linux system but on your actual hardware so you don’t have the overhead of emulation, it’s really cool for a lot of things!

        • Zeppo
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          Huh, okay. I thought it was a quick way to set up a VM - that’s how much I don’t know! I should probably look into it, thanks.

    • @3v1n0@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      Docker requires management and some setup. A server snap just works, it’s updated automatically and rolls back when necessary.

      It’s just a breeze. I use it for nextcloud and I’m safe for years with no maintenance from my side at all.

      • Gamey
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I won’t use it myself because I don’t think it’s a good idea to give Canonical or any other company that much power and don’t think it’s centralized nature should be how such package systems work but I don’t think it’s a bad system at all! The sandboxing has it’s hurtles but it’s really good and I am a huge fan of proper sandboxing so if it works for you it’s certainly a good option!